Existing Model (G) vs New Model (120) vs New Model (U)

In this post we present a comparison of the existing model “G” vs the new model “U” mentioned in the last post which includes additional cycles, and a new model “120” which is a variation of the model G..

G – Blue line (weekly model) – existing model

120 – Green line (weekly model) – new model

U – Red line (weekly model) – new model

Compared stocks:

There are 27 price instruments compared, from different sectors and different price levels: SPY, COIN, NEM, LMT, ENPH, CEG, AZN, AMD, VST, ZETA, ACN, ADSK, CPAY, EQIX, EXP, FFIV, HD, MA, ORLY, PH, TRV, V, ADBE, ETH-USD, NVDA, AAPL, NIFTY-50.

Comparison period:

The comparison period is one year (from 1-1-2024 to 1-1-2025), which is far beyond what is offered as prediction, for two reasons: to enable a wider scale for comparison, and to show that the models can most accurately predict up to a year ahead.

Conclusions:

Existing model (G) is performing well for long term predictions.
Model 120 sometimes adds more information on top of model G.
New Model (U) may be sometimes more accurate for the short term of few weeks.

Operatives:

The U model will be considered to added to the delivered charts of existing G model.
Since there may be more inverse cases for the U model, the U model inverse chart will also be delivered.
IN the case of adding the model U, Model G provides the general trend while model U provides some more details.

Details:

SPY